Baseball Forum - MLB Forum - Fantasy & College Baseball Forums

Baseball Forum - MLB Forum - Fantasy & College Baseball Forums (https://www.baseballforum.com/forum.php)
-   Baseball History & Teams of Yester-year (https://www.baseballforum.com/baseball-history-teams-yester-year/)
-   -   Should Baseball's Modern Era be Redefined? (https://www.baseballforum.com/baseball-history-teams-yester-year/81509-should-baseballs-modern-era-redefined.html)

Nebo86 05-29-2012 05:26 PM

Should Baseball's Modern Era be Redefined?
 
I was hoping to write a blog on this topic and bumped into the following Jayson Starks article which pretty much summed up my idea. Except , that I originally had 1976 as line of demarcation for the Modern Era; but Starks' article makes a very good case for 1969. Enjoy "Drawing the line at 1969" by Jayson Starks:

Here is an excerpt...
Quote:

June 5, 2006
In 1900, there was no such thing as air conditioners, movies, corn flakes or bubble gum. But somehow, in baseball, we consider 1900 to be part of the "modern" era. You couldn't listen to a game on a radio in 1900, let alone watch one on DirecTV. And you couldn't buy a Model T to drive to a game, so you sure as heck couldn't fly across country to play in one. But in baseball, those were "modern" times. Well, here in this corner of ESPN.com, we may not be quite as futuristic as, say, Steve Jobs. Or even M Night Shyamalan. But we think we know the difference between modern and ancient. So how can we not wonder: What's up with that?

Just a week ago, we examined the most romantic records in baseball. And we asked you, our loyal readers, about this very question: How the heck can baseball consider anything that happened in 1900 to be a "modern" record? Nearly 500 e-mails later, you people have spoken. Or written, anyway. Many of you agree with us -- that it's time to revise the record book's definition of "modern." Some of you -- possibly the ones who are still walking around in 20-year-old sports jackets -- think we're nutcases for even suggesting anything that sacrilegious. Well, we've considered all the arguments. Now it's time to present our case.

1. Why We Need To Change
It wasn't only the outside world that looked a little different in 1900, back in a time when people's idea of cool technology was a vacuum cleaner. It was baseball itself. Tell us this was the same sport we're watching today:...

2. When Modern Became Modern
Pick a year. Any year. Well, not quite any year. There has to be a decent reason to pick a year when our new "modern" age truly began. And by that, we don't mean the year your grandmother got married. So based on recommendations by our panel of experts and by our readers, we've laid out the best choices:

1920: Babe Ruth starts bopping. "Live-ball era" begins. Baseball invents a job known as "commissioner" in the wake of the Black Sox mess.

1947: The stars are all back from World War II. But more important, Jackie Robinson arrives -- and changes the sport forever.

1961: Expansion kicks in. American League goes to the 162-game season (with the National League to follow a year later). All teams are finally integrated.

1969: Big year. First year of division play and the expanded postseason. Pitcher's mound lowered five inches. Strike zone shrinks. Five-man rotations kicking in. The save is invented. More expansion. Unbalanced schedules.

1973: Designated hitters allowed to roam the baseball earth -- or half of it, anyhow.

1976: Dawn of a little concept we like to call "free agency."

1987: The age of offense erupts. Is it the baseballs? Is it the bats? Is it the fitness centers? Is it Jose Canseco's chemistry set? Yes, yes, yes and yes.

1995: Strike ends. Payroll disparity explodes. Everybody has a new ballpark, or has an architect designing one. Wild cards send purists to the emergency room.
Read whole article @ Drawing the line at 1969 - MLB - ESPN

Any thoughts?

JustinVerlander35 05-29-2012 07:12 PM

I think when the live ball era started.

Kelzzy 05-29-2012 09:20 PM

Same here. I think the game became more professional then.. if I'm reading this right.

Nebo86 06-01-2012 11:34 PM

Baseball has been Professional almost since its creation. I went with 1969, because the league was fully integrated, expanded west of the Mississippi and beginning of divisions and expanded playoffs. The Save was officially recognized in 1969, the DH and Free Agency were right around the corner. It would have been great to read about the live-ball era and integration starting together, but unfortunately Judge Landis did not allow it and never did. How much better would MLB have been with players like Josh Gibson, Cool Papa Bell and a younger Satchel Paige?

Dizzy Dean 17 08-21-2013 09:47 AM

1987 isn't a good cutoff. The first half of that season saw an explosion in offense, but as you look at all those guys hitting HRs like crazy that year, it ws mostly in the first half of the season. The ball settled down in the second half. Then offense went pretty much back to "normal" for that era until the mid-1990s when the chemistry sets had truly taken over the game...

To really redefine the term "Modern Era" I guess I would agree with the beginning of expansion in 1961 or the LCS era starting in 1969. That way, integration hadn't just happened (it took some teams a very LONG time to get on board with integrating their rosters) and the NL was by FAR the stronger league for a couple decades after integration, due to AL teams being a bit slow to progress...

That said, I will go with 1969. Two divisions per league, integrated rosters (also really beginning to make use of the talent south of our national boarders), the Second Dead Ball Era was coming to a close (even though the 70s and 80s were still lower offense eras, with HUGE parks like the Astrodome and Busch Stadium), and most fans should still know somebody who was alive then... As if 1900 was back in the time of the dinosaurs...

Of course, the Divisonal Era/Wild Cars Era/Steroid Era whatever you want to call it, has been around for almost 20 years now. It may not be much longer before someone is whining to make that the new Modern Era! After all, we didn't have ipods, ipads, texting, DirectTV or whatever that guy in the article was whining about, back in 1993 before the Divisional Era...


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome